On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:50:46PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Jonathan Neuschäfer
> <j.neuschae...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > The aim of this patchset is to move the GPIO subsystem's documentation
> > under Documentation/driver-api/gpio/ such that it is picked up by Sphinx
> > and compiled into HTML.
> Awesome!
> > I moved everything except for sysfs.txt, because
> > this file describes the legacy sysfs ABI, and doesn't seem to serve much
> > (non-historical) purpose anymore.
> >
> > There are still some rough edges:
> >
> > * I think the API documentation (kernel-doc) should be moved out of
> >   index.rst into more appropriate files.
> > * The headings are arguably wrong, because driver.rst, consumer.rst,
> >   etc. use the "document title" style, even though they are part of the
> >   GPIO chapter. But the resulting TOC tree is consistent, and I did not
> >   want to change almost all headings.
> > * Some of the files could use more :c:func:`...` references and general
> >   ReST polish.
> >
> > But I don't want to make this patchset too large.
> It's fine, we take it one step at a time.
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:41:20AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Anyway, I'm happy to take these through the docs tree or see them go via
> > GPIO; Linus, what's your preference?
> I might have some doc patches that could collide so I can take them.
> I take it there will be a v2?

Not necessarily, but if I need to rebase on a different branch, or on
future linux-next, I'll do that. (Or if some other issue is found.)

I thought that patch 8/8 currently requires commit 93db446a424c ("mtd:
nand: move raw NAND related code to the raw/ subdir"), which is in next
through Boris Brezillon's nand tree, but this isn't true. The patchset
(currently) applies to both v4.16-rc4 and next, AFAICS.

Jonathan Neuschäfer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to