On 02/21/2018 05:55 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
>                       pkey, pkey, pkey_rights);
>       pkey_assert(pkey_rights >= 0);
>  
> -     pkey_rights |= flags;
> +     pkey_rights &= ~flags;
>  
>       ret = pkey_set(pkey, pkey_rights, 0);
>       /* pkey_reg and flags have the same format */
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
>       dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%016lx\n", __func__,
>                       pkey, rdpkey_reg());
>       if (flags)
> -             assert(rdpkey_reg() > orig_pkey_reg);
> +             assert(rdpkey_reg() < orig_pkey_reg);
>  }
>  
>  void pkey_write_allow(int pkey)

This seems so horribly wrong that I wonder how it worked in the first
place.  Any idea?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to