From: Nadav Amit Sent: November 1, 2018 at 4:31:59 PM GMT > To: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>, Matthew Wilcox > <[email protected]>, Kees Cook <[email protected]>, Igor Stoppa > <[email protected]>, Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>, Dave Chinner > <[email protected]>, James Morris <[email protected]>, Michal Hocko > <[email protected]>, Kernel Hardening <[email protected]>, > linux-integrity <[email protected]>, linux-security-module > <[email protected]>, Igor Stoppa > <[email protected]>, Dave Hansen <[email protected]>, Jonathan > Corbet <[email protected]>, Laura Abbott <[email protected]>, Randy Dunlap > <[email protected]>, Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>, open > list:DOCUMENTATION <[email protected]>, LKML > <[email protected]>, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] prmem: documentation > > > From: Peter Zijlstra > Sent: October 31, 2018 at 9:08:35 AM GMT >> To: Nadav Amit <[email protected]> >> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>, Matthew Wilcox >> <[email protected]>, Kees Cook <[email protected]>, Igor Stoppa >> <[email protected]>, Mimi Zohar <[email protected]>, Dave Chinner >> <[email protected]>, James Morris <[email protected]>, Michal Hocko >> <[email protected]>, Kernel Hardening <[email protected]>, >> linux-integrity <[email protected]>, linux-security-module >> <[email protected]>, Igor Stoppa >> <[email protected]>, Dave Hansen <[email protected]>, >> Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>, Laura Abbott <[email protected]>, Randy >> Dunlap <[email protected]>, Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>, >> open list:DOCUMENTATION <[email protected]>, LKML >> <[email protected]>, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] prmem: documentation >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 04:18:39PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: >>>> Nadav, want to resubmit your series? IIRC the only thing wrong with it was >>>> that it was a big change and we wanted a simpler fix to backport. But >>>> that’s all done now, and I, at least, rather liked your code. :) >>> >>> I guess since it was based on your ideas… >>> >>> Anyhow, the only open issue that I have with v2 is Peter’s wish that I would >>> make kgdb use of poke_text() less disgusting. I still don’t know exactly >>> how to deal with it. >>> >>> Perhaps it (fixing kgdb) can be postponed? In that case I can just resend >>> v2. >> >> Oh man, I completely forgot about kgdb :/ >> >> Also, would it be possible to entirely remove that kmap fallback path? > > Let me see what I can do about it.
My patches had several embarrassing bugs. I’m fixing and will resend later, hopefully today.
