On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:59:24AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> This seems to be an extremely common mistake to make (indeed, almost
> 3000 occurrences of 'Returns:' vs 5300 occurrences of 'Return:').
Add to that ~1000 '@return:'.
But scripts/kernel-doc does not really care:
} elsif ($newsection =~ m/^return?$/i) {
$newsection = $section_return;
} elsif ($newsection =~ m/^\@return$/) {
# special: @return is a section, not a param description
$newsection = $section_return;
}
> Could we have a checkpatch warning for it?
Does checkpatch checks the kernel-doc parts at all?
> ----- Forwarded message from Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> -----
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:59:27PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > v3: Moved 'Returns:" comment after description.
> > Explained in the commit log why the function is defined static inline
> >
> > v2: Added "Returns:" comment and removed probe_user_address()
>
> The correct spelling is 'Return:', not 'Returns:':
>
> Return values
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The return value, if any, should be described in a dedicated section
> named ``Return``.
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
