On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:19:25AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 09:52:05 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> >> Em Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:17:01 -0400
> >> Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> escreveu:
> >
> >>>>> (4) I would argue that every occurence of
> >>>>> A ->(some dependency) B should be replaced with fixed size font in the
> >>>>> HTML
> >>>>> results.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just place those with ``A -> (some dependency)``. This will make them use
> >>>> a fixed size font.
> >>>
> >>> Ok, understood all these. I guess my point was all of these will need to
> >>> be
> >>> done to make this document useful from a ReST conversion standpoint. Until
> >>> then it is probably just better off being plain text - since there are so
> >>> many of those ``A -> (dep) B`` things.
> >
> >> On a very quick look, it seems that, if we replace:
> >>
> >> (\S+\s->\S*\s\w+)
> >>
> >> by:
> >> ``\1``
> >>
> >>
> >> On an editor that would allow to manually replace the regex (like kate),
> >> most of those can be get.
> >>
> >> See patch enclosed.
> >
> > Some time ago I considered the problem of converting this file to ReST
> > format. But I gave up on the idea, because the necessary changes were
> > so widespread and the resulting text file would not be easily readable.
> >
> > Replacing things of the form "A ->dep B" just scratches the surface.
> > That document teems with variable names, formulas, code extracts, and
> > other things which would all need to be rendered in a different font
> > style. The density of the markup required to do this would be
> > phenomenally high.
> >
> > In my opinion it simply was not worthwhile.
>
> +1 on keeping this and the other .txt files of LKMM intact.
Looks like a pretty clear consensus thus far. Any objections to keeping
these .txt for the time being?
Thanx, Paul
