On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:41:54AM -0600, John Groves wrote:
> Famfs works on both /dev/pmem and /dev/dax devices. This commit introduces
> the function that opens a block (pmem) device and the struct
> dax_holder_operations that are needed for that ABI.
> 
> In this commit, support for opening character /dev/dax is stubbed. A
> later commit introduces this capability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Groves <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c b/fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c
> index 3329aff000d1..82c861998093 100644
> --- a/fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/famfs/famfs_inode.c
> @@ -68,5 +68,88 @@ static const struct super_operations famfs_ops = {
>       .show_options   = famfs_show_options,
>  };
>  
> +/***************************************************************************************
> + * dax_holder_operations for block dax
> + */
> +
> +static int
> +famfs_blk_dax_notify_failure(
> +     struct dax_device       *dax_devp,
> +     u64                     offset,
> +     u64                     len,
> +     int                     mf_flags)
> +{
> +
> +     pr_err("%s: dax_devp %llx offset %llx len %lld mf_flags %x\n",
> +            __func__, (u64)dax_devp, (u64)offset, (u64)len, mf_flags);
> +     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +const struct dax_holder_operations famfs_blk_dax_holder_ops = {
> +     .notify_failure         = famfs_blk_dax_notify_failure,
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +famfs_open_char_device(
> +     struct super_block *sb,
> +     struct fs_context  *fc)
> +{
> +     pr_err("%s: Root device is %s, but your kernel does not support famfs 
> on /dev/dax\n",
> +            __func__, fc->source);
> +     return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * famfs_open_device()
> + *
> + * Open the memory device. If it looks like /dev/dax, call 
> famfs_open_char_device().
> + * Otherwise try to open it as a block/pmem device.
> + */
> +static int
> +famfs_open_device(

I'm confused why that function is added here but it's completely unclear
in what wider context it's called. This is really hard to follow.

> +     struct super_block *sb,
> +     struct fs_context  *fc)
> +{
> +     struct famfs_fs_info *fsi = sb->s_fs_info;
> +     struct dax_device    *dax_devp;
> +     u64 start_off = 0;
> +     struct bdev_handle   *handlep;
> +
> +     if (fsi->dax_devp) {
> +             pr_err("%s: already mounted\n", __func__);
> +             return -EALREADY;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (strstr(fc->source, "/dev/dax")) /* There is probably a better way 
> to check this */
> +             return famfs_open_char_device(sb, fc);
> +
> +     if (!strstr(fc->source, "/dev/pmem")) { /* There is probably a better 
> way to check this */

Yeah, this is not just a bit ugly but also likely wrong because:

sudo mount --bind /dev/pmem /opt/muhaha

fsconfig(fd_fs, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "source", "/opt/muhaha", [...])

or a simple mknod to create that device somewhere else. You likely want:

lookup_bdev(fc->source, &dev);

if (!DEVICE_NUMBER_SOMETHING_SOMETHING_SANE(dev))
        return invalfc(fc, "SOMETHING SOMETHING...

bdev_open_by_dev(dev, ....)

(This reminds me that I should get back to making it possible to specify
"source" as a file descriptor instead of a mere string with the new
mount api...)

> +             pr_err("%s: primary backing dev (%s) is not pmem\n",
> +                    __func__, fc->source);
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     handlep = bdev_open_by_path(fc->source, FAMFS_BLKDEV_MODE, fsi, 
> &fs_holder_ops);

Hm, I suspected that FAMFS_BLKDEV_MODE would be wrong based on:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/13556dbbd8d0f51bc31e3bdec796283fe85c6baf.1708709155.git.j...@groves.net

It's defined as FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE which is wrong. But these
helpers want BLOCK_OPEN_READ | BLOCK_OPEN_WRITE.

> +     if (IS_ERR(handlep->bdev)) {

@bdev_handle will be gone as of v6.9 so you might want to wait until
then to resend.

> +             pr_err("%s: failed blkdev_get_by_path(%s)\n", __func__, 
> fc->source);
> +             return PTR_ERR(handlep->bdev);
> +     }
> +
> +     dax_devp = fs_dax_get_by_bdev(handlep->bdev, &start_off,
> +                                   fsi  /* holder */,
> +                                   &famfs_blk_dax_holder_ops);
> +     if (IS_ERR(dax_devp)) {
> +             pr_err("%s: unable to get daxdev from handlep->bdev\n", 
> __func__);
> +             bdev_release(handlep);
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +     }
> +     fsi->bdev_handle = handlep;
> +     fsi->dax_devp    = dax_devp;
> +
> +     pr_notice("%s: root device is block dax (%s)\n", __func__, fc->source);
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
>  
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reply via email to