On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 4:45 PM Finn Behrens <[email protected]> wrote: > > One idea below, but fine with or without it. > > Reviewed-by: Finn Behrens <[email protected]>
Thanks Finn! > Would it make sense to not advise the min version but the “max” or just > latest stable version? Min version should work as well latest could > potentially be a bit more optimised if both work either way? Yeah, that is a good idea -- we could just say `stable` there. In fact, it makes more sense, because this is using `rustup`, i.e. the Rust-provided binaries, and the Rust project only supports the latest version (so far -- there are proposals about LTSs there). Cheers, Miguel
