> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 3:38 PM
> To: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>; Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) 
> <chia-yu.ch...@nokia-bell-labs.com>
> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; cor...@lwn.net; ho...@kernel.org; 
> dsah...@kernel.org; kun...@amazon.com; b...@vger.kernel.org; 
> net...@vger.kernel.org; dave.t...@gmail.com; j...@mojatatu.com; 
> k...@kernel.org; step...@networkplumber.org; xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com; 
> j...@resnulli.us; da...@davemloft.net; andrew+net...@lunn.ch; 
> donald.hun...@gmail.com; a...@fiberby.net; liuhang...@gmail.com; 
> sh...@kernel.org; linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org; i...@kernel.org; 
> ncardw...@google.com; Koen De Schepper (Nokia) 
> <koen.de_schep...@nokia-bell-labs.com>; g.white <g.wh...@cablelabs.com>; 
> ingemar.s.johans...@ericsson.com; mirja.kuehlew...@ericsson.com; 
> chesh...@apple.com; rs.i...@gmx.at; jason_living...@comcast.com; vidhi_goel 
> <vidhi_g...@apple.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 09/15] tcp: accecn: AccECN option
> 
> 
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking 
> links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional 
> information.
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/20/25 12:32 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 2:31 AM Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/14/25 3:56 PM, chia-yu.ch...@nokia-bell-labs.com wrote:
> >>> This patch uses the existing 1-byte holes in the tcp_sock_write_txrx 
> >>> group for new u8 members, but adds a 4-byte hole in 
> >>> tcp_sock_write_rx group after the new u32 delivered_ecn_bytes[3] 
> >>> member. Therefore, the group size of tcp_sock_write_rx is increased from 
> >>> 96 to 112.
> >>
> >> Note that I'm still concerned by the relevant increase of the 
> >> cacheline groups size. My fear is that this change could defeat 
> >> some/most of the benefist from the cacheline reorg for all tcp users.
> >>
> >> Some additional feedback from Eric and/or Neal more than welcome!
> >
> > I have been trapped lately with production issues, sorry for the delay.
> >
> > I am still working on an idpf bug, hopefully done today.
> >
> > Then, I am OOO tomorrow, and can have a look at the whole series on 
> > Thursday.
> 
> Thanks Eric!
> 
> @Chia-Yu: please consider the above timeline before posting a new revision. 
> i.e. it would be likely wise to wait for the additional review.
>
> /P

Hi Eric and Paolo,

As you know that the merge window for v6.16 is begun and net-next is closed for 
new features till 9th of June.

May I ask did you manage yo review the patches we sent two weeks ago? 

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Chia-Yu

Reply via email to