On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 16:51:47 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote: > It is unclear why a second scan is needed and only the second one caught > something. Was it the same with the strange issues you mentioned in > driver tests? Do you think I should re-add the second scan + cat?
Not sure, cc: Catalin, from experience it seems like second scan often surfaces issues the first scan missed. > When looking at the modifications of this series, it is unclear what > could cause that. Yes, I don't think it's related to the series. For one thing the series a couple of before the first report.
