Add Kunit test cases for the revocable API.

The test cases cover the following scenarios:
- Basic: Verifies that a consumer can successfully access the resource
  provided via the provider.
- Revocation: Verifies that after the provider revokes the resource,
  the consumer correctly receives a NULL pointer on a subsequent access.
- Macro: Same as "Revocation" but uses the REVOCABLE().

A way to run the test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
        --kconfig_add CONFIG_REVOCABLE_KUNIT_TEST=y \
        revocable_test

Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]>
---
v5:
- No changes.

v4: 
https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/[email protected]
- REVOCABLE() -> REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_WITH().
- revocable_release() -> revocable_withdraw_access().

v3: 
https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/[email protected]
- No changes.

v2: 
https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/[email protected]
- New in the series.

 MAINTAINERS                   |   1 +
 drivers/base/Kconfig          |   8 +++
 drivers/base/Makefile         |   3 +
 drivers/base/revocable_test.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/base/revocable_test.c

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 7d00ff431af9..7207538f31f4 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -22025,6 +22025,7 @@ M:      Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]>
 L:     [email protected]
 S:     Maintained
 F:     drivers/base/revocable.c
+F:     drivers/base/revocable_test.c
 F:     include/linux/revocable.h
 
 RFKILL
diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
index 1786d87b29e2..8f7d7b9d81ac 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
@@ -250,3 +250,11 @@ config FW_DEVLINK_SYNC_STATE_TIMEOUT
          work on.
 
 endmenu
+
+# Kunit test cases
+config REVOCABLE_KUNIT_TEST
+       tristate "Kunit tests for revocable" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+       depends on KUNIT
+       default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+       help
+         Kunit tests for the revocable API.
diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
index bdf854694e39..4185aaa9bbb9 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
@@ -35,3 +35,6 @@ ccflags-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER) := -DDEBUG
 # define_trace.h needs to know how to find our header
 CFLAGS_trace.o         := -I$(src)
 obj-$(CONFIG_TRACING)  += trace.o
+
+# Kunit test cases
+obj-$(CONFIG_REVOCABLE_KUNIT_TEST)     += revocable_test.o
diff --git a/drivers/base/revocable_test.c b/drivers/base/revocable_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1c3e08ba0505
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/base/revocable_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright 2025 Google LLC
+ *
+ * Kunit tests for the revocable API.
+ *
+ * The test cases cover the following scenarios:
+ *
+ * - Basic: Verifies that a consumer can successfully access the resource
+ *   provided via the provider.
+ *
+ * - Revocation: Verifies that after the provider revokes the resource,
+ *   the consumer correctly receives a NULL pointer on a subsequent access.
+ *
+ * - Macro: Same as "Revocation" but uses the REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_WITH().
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/revocable.h>
+
+static void revocable_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct revocable_provider *rp;
+       struct revocable *rev;
+       void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+
+       rp = revocable_provider_alloc(real_res);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, rp);
+
+       rev = revocable_alloc(rp);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, rev);
+
+       res = revocable_try_access(rev);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+       revocable_withdraw_access(rev);
+
+       revocable_free(rev);
+       revocable_provider_revoke(rp);
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_revocation(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct revocable_provider *rp;
+       struct revocable *rev;
+       void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+
+       rp = revocable_provider_alloc(real_res);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, rp);
+
+       rev = revocable_alloc(rp);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, rev);
+
+       res = revocable_try_access(rev);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+       revocable_withdraw_access(rev);
+
+       revocable_provider_revoke(rp);
+
+       res = revocable_try_access(rev);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, NULL);
+       revocable_withdraw_access(rev);
+
+       revocable_free(rev);
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_macro(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct revocable_provider *rp;
+       struct revocable *rev;
+       void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+       bool accessed;
+
+       rp = revocable_provider_alloc(real_res);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, rp);
+
+       rev = revocable_alloc(rp);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, rev);
+
+       accessed = false;
+       REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_WITH(rev, res) {
+               KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+               accessed = true;
+       }
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, accessed);
+
+       revocable_provider_revoke(rp);
+
+       accessed = false;
+       REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_WITH(rev, res) {
+               KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, NULL);
+               accessed = true;
+       }
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, accessed);
+
+       revocable_free(rev);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case revocable_test_cases[] = {
+       KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_basic),
+       KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_revocation),
+       KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_macro),
+       {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite revocable_test_suite = {
+       .name = "revocable_test",
+       .test_cases = revocable_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(revocable_test_suite);
-- 
2.51.0.788.g6d19910ace-goog


Reply via email to