Hi Arnaud,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2025 4:26 AM
> To: Peng Fan <[email protected]>; Shenwei Wang <[email protected]>;
> Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>; Mathieu Poirier
> <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; Krzysztof
> Kozlowski <[email protected]>; Conor Dooley <[email protected]>; Shawn
> Guo <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>;
> Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>; Linus Walleij <[email protected]>;
> Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>; Fabio Estevam
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-arm-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>; Randy Dunlap
> <[email protected]>; Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>; linux-
> [email protected]
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Enable Remote GPIO over RPMSG on i.MX
> Platform
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/5/25 02:12, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Shenwei
> >
> >> Subject: [PATCH v5 0/5] Enable Remote GPIO over RPMSG on i.MX
> >> Platform
> >>
> >> Support the remote devices on the remote processor via the RPMSG bus
> >> on i.MX platform.
> >>
> >
> > I have not look into the details of new version, but before that, just
> > want to check, have we agreed on what Arnaud suggested?
> > or continue to proceed to be this as i.MX specific?
> 
> Thanks, Peng, for pointing this out. Regarding the V3 discussions, it seems 
> that I
> am not the only one suggesting a generic driver.
> 

As I mentioned before, the only i.MX-specific part is the transport protocol 
over the RPMSG bus. 
In this v5 patches, we’ve included detailed documentation for the protocol in a 
separate file. Any 
platform that follows the same protocol should work right out of the box. 

If you spot anything that could be improved, please let me know!

Thanks,
Shenwei 

> Thanks,
> Arnaud
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> > Peng.

Reply via email to