On 11/05, Mina Almasry wrote: > On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 9:34 AM Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On 11/04, Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > From: Bobby Eshleman <[email protected]> > > > > > > > [..] > > > > > +Autorelease Control > > > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Have you considered an option to have this flag on the dmabuf binding > > itself? This will let us keep everything in ynl and not add a new socket > > option. I think also semantically, this is a property of the binding > > and not the socket? (not sure what's gonna happen if we have > > autorelease=on and autorelease=off sockets receiving to the same > > dmabuf) > > I think this thread (and maybe other comments on that patch) is the > context that missed your inbox: > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/ > > Let us know if you disagree.
Thanks, I did miss that whole v5 because I was OOO, let me take a look!
