On 10/30/25 3:34 PM, [email protected] wrote: > From: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]> > > As AccECN may keep CWR bit asserted due to different > interpretation of the bit, flushing with GRO because of > CWR may effectively disable GRO until AccECN counter > field changes such that CWR-bit becomes 0. > > There is no harm done from not immediately forwarding the > CWR'ed segment with RFC3168 ECN. > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Chia-Yu Chang <[email protected]>
Please provide a test/update the existing one to cover this case or move to a later series. Possibly both :) /P
