On 1/13/26 10:19, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On 1/9/26 12:28 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
@@ -4478,7 +4485,7 @@ static void bnxt_init_one_rx_agg_ring_rxbd(struct bnxt 
*bp,
        ring = &rxr->rx_agg_ring_struct;
        ring->fw_ring_id = INVALID_HW_RING_ID;
        if ((bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_AGG_RINGS)) {
-               type = ((u32)BNXT_RX_PAGE_SIZE << RX_BD_LEN_SHIFT) |
+               type = ((u32)(u32)rxr->rx_page_size << RX_BD_LEN_SHIFT) |

Minor nit: duplicate cast above.

oops, missed that, thanks


diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
index f5f07a7e6b29..4c880a9fba92 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.h
@@ -1107,6 +1107,7 @@ struct bnxt_rx_ring_info {
unsigned long *rx_agg_bmap;
        u16                     rx_agg_bmap_size;
+       u16                     rx_page_size;

Any special reason for using u16 above? AFAICS using u32 will not change
the struct size on 64 bit arches, and using u32 will likely yield better
code.

IIRC bnxt doesn't support more than 2^16-1, but it doesn't really
matter, I can convert it to u32.

--
Pavel Begunkov


Reply via email to