> -----Original Message----- > From: Neal Cardwell <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 11:47 PM > To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Koen De > Schepper (Nokia) <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; cheshire <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Vidhi Goel <[email protected]>; Willem de > Bruijn <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] selftests/net: Add packetdrill packetdrill > cases > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking > links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional > information. > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 10:58 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Chia-Yu Chang <[email protected]> > > > > Linux Accurate ECN test sets using ACE counters and AccECN options to > > cover several scenarios: Connection teardown, different ACK > > conditions, counter wrapping, SACK space grabbing, fallback schemes, > > negotiation retransmission/reorder/loss, AccECN option drop/loss, > > different handshake reflectors, data with marking, and different sysctl > > values. > > > > Co-developed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]> > > Co-developed-by: Neal Cardwell <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <[email protected]> > > --- > > Chia-Yu, thank you for posting the packetdrill tests. > > A couple thoughts: > > (1) These tests are using the experimental AccECN packetdrill support that is > not in mainline packetdrill yet. Can you please share the github URL for the > version of packetdrill you used? I will work on merging the appropriate > experimental AccECN packetdrill support into the Google packetdrill mainline > branch. > > (2) The last I heard, the tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ > infrastructure does not run tests in subdirectories of that packetdrill/ > directory, and that is why all the tests in > tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ are in a single directory. > When you run these tests, do all the tests actually get run? Just wanted to > check this. :-) > > Thanks! > neal
Hi Neal, Regards (2), I will put all ACCECN cases in the tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ But I would like to include another script to avoid running these AccECN tests one-by-one manually, does it make sense to you? Thanks. Chia-Yu
