> -----Original Message----- > From: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2026 12:14 AM > To: Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Koen > De Schepper (Nokia) <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; cheshire <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Vidhi Goel <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/1] AccECN packetdrill selftest series > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking > links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional > information. > > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:29:14 +0100 [email protected] > wrote: > > Please find the v2 AccECN packetdrill selftest patch series, which > > includes 58 test cases used to verify the functionality of Accurate > > ECN spec (RFC9768) under a variety of conditions. > > > > The used packetdrill is commit > > 6f2116af6b7e1936a53e80ab31b77f74abda1aaa > > of the branch: > > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith > > ub.com%2Fminuscat%2Fpacketdrill_accecn&data=05%7C02%7Cchia-yu.chang%40 > > nokia-bell-labs.com%7Cbe1f1184a6a5443ee1df08de53c293f4%7C5d47175196754 > > 28d917b70f44f9630b0%7C0%7C0%7C639040292324032411%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb > > 3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjo > > iTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i0bK%2BtTQnbohn0cLgDDlSh4 > > vHeaa8jLpka7rFy8vo18%3D&reserved=0 > > Missing your own SoB on the patch, but also -- are these supposed to pass > without the kernel patches? Without going back to check Paolo's message my > understanding was that you'd repost this as patch 15 of the kernel series. > > On the packetdrill side -- is PR #61 the code we need merged? > Doesn't seem like it. Could you please clean that part up and start the > review process?
Thanks, I will add my own SoB in the next version. This patch can NOT pass without the last kernel patch; shall I merge this series into that kernel series? If yes, I will submit v8 on that series and add this patch as the last one. On the packetdrill, the used packetdrill is commit 6f2116af6b7e1936a53e80ab31b77f74abda1aaa of the branch: https://github.com/minuscat/packetdrill_accecn Shall I create PR? Or above info is ok for merging into packetdrill. Thanks. Chia-Yu
