From: John Groves <[email protected]>

Famfs is memory-backed; there is no place to write back to, and no
reason to mark pages dirty at all.

Signed-off-by: John Groves <[email protected]>
---
 fs/fuse/famfs.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/famfs.c b/fs/fuse/famfs.c
index b38e92d8f381..90325bd14354 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/famfs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/famfs.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/dax.h>
 #include <linux/iomap.h>
+#include <linux/pagemap.h>
 #include <linux/path.h>
 #include <linux/namei.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
@@ -39,6 +40,15 @@ static const struct dax_holder_operations 
famfs_fuse_dax_holder_ops = {
        .notify_failure         = famfs_dax_notify_failure,
 };
 
+/*
+ * DAX address_space_operations for famfs.
+ * famfs doesn't need dirty tracking - writes go directly to
+ * memory with no writeback required.
+ */
+static const struct address_space_operations famfs_dax_aops = {
+       .dirty_folio    = noop_dirty_folio,
+};
+
 /*****************************************************************************/
 
 /*
@@ -627,6 +637,7 @@ famfs_file_init_dax(
        if (famfs_meta_set(fi, meta) == NULL) {
                i_size_write(inode, meta->file_size);
                inode->i_flags |= S_DAX;
+               inode->i_data.a_ops = &famfs_dax_aops;
        } else {
                pr_debug("%s: file already had metadata\n", __func__);
                __famfs_meta_free(meta);
-- 
2.52.0



Reply via email to