On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 7:59 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
>
> As AccECN may keep CWR bit asserted due to different
> interpretation of the bit, flushing with GRO because of
> CWR may effectively disable GRO until AccECN counter
> field changes such that CWR-bit becomes 0.
>
> There is no harm done from not immediately forwarding the
> CWR'ed segment with RFC3168 ECN.

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

Reply via email to