On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 7:59 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]> > > As AccECN may keep CWR bit asserted due to different > interpretation of the bit, flushing with GRO because of > CWR may effectively disable GRO until AccECN counter > field changes such that CWR-bit becomes 0. > > There is no harm done from not immediately forwarding the > CWR'ed segment with RFC3168 ECN.
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
