Hi,

On 1/22/26 3:15 AM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> Add testing notice to "Before creating patches" section.
> 
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst 
> b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> index 9999bcbdccc9..0271a4dc525e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
> @@ -40,7 +40,12 @@ sending patches to the development community.  These 
> include:
>   - Test the code to the extent that you can.  Make use of the kernel's
>     debugging tools, ensure that the kernel will build with all reasonable
>     combinations of configuration options, use cross-compilers to build for
> -   different architectures, etc.
> +   different architectures, etc. Add tests, likely using an existing
> +   testing frameworks like KUnit, and include them as a separate member

              framework

> +   of your series (see the next section on what about the series is).

                     (see the next section for more about patch series).

> +   Note that this may be mandatory when affecting some subsystems. For
> +   example, library functions (resides under lib/) are extensively used
> +   almost everywhere and expected to be tested appropriately.
>  
>   - Make sure your code is compliant with the kernel coding style
>     guidelines.

-- 
~Randy


Reply via email to