On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 01:28:49PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Switching the types will make some later changes cleaner. > size_t is also the semantically correct type for this field. > > As both 'size_t' and 'unsigned int' are always the same size, this > should be risk-free.
include/uapi/asm-generic/posix_types.h states: | * Most 32 bit architectures use "unsigned int" size_t, | * and all 64 bit architectures use "unsigned long" size_t. Is that statement wrong? Or did I mix up the context? Kind regards, Nicolas
