On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 11:44:25AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > And if so, would be this series acceptable > > > as-is then (modulo the better include-sorting mentioned by Andy)? > > > > *From my experience it's not the Q "will they or not?", the Q is "when?" > > they start abusing it. I really prefer to hide as much as possible from > > I totally agree with you on that. > > > day 1. Maybe the structure can be split to two? Currently IIO has a > > I also thought that keeping some internal header might provide that > safety. When looking into it, I didn't see an obvious and somewhat > elegant way. Even more, I got a better picture of why Bjorn named the > current approach "unergonomic". I got some ideas which look doable in my > time frame. I will try going the full route, after all.
Thanks! Looking forward for the rest, the cleanup is quite good, no added lines. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
