On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 02:32:50PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2026-09-28 at 12:00 +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > > Not sure where this should be merged? I guess selftests would make most > > > sense, but you can't actually test it out before the UML nommu changes, > > > so that doesn't work too well right now? > > > > I seem to recall Hajime saying he tested this on an actual nommu > > device/virtualised equivalent so nommu UML isn't strictly necessary (though > > very > > nice to have!) > > Oh, I don't recall, but I guess that's plausibe. > > > I think I saw something fly by that implied it might be coming in 7.4 is > > that > > so? :) > > I did end up merging just about everything that was pending for > uml/next, so if we don't forget to send a pull request in the merge > window, or something equally catastrophic happens, yes ;-)
Awesome, thanks! :) > > Sorry for the delay. The onslaught of LLMs means priority is elsewhere, > sadly. Yeah understood, onslaught has reached all areas of the kernel it seems... > > johannes -- Cheers, Lorenzo
