Felix Domke wrote: >>I modified the DiSEqC ioctl's to FE_DISEQC_SEND_MASTER_CMD and >>FE_DISEQC_RECV_SLAVE_REPLY so that we can handle two-way DiSEqC 2.0. >>Anyway, I don't have a device here where I can implement and test this... > > So please add a frontend event too, as well as the possibility to send > non-blocking diseqc and get an event when it's done. > > i would hate having one thread for each FD :) >
Then we would have to simulate this behaviour in the driver using kernel threads or a tricky state machine - this would be error-prone and causes much higher complexity. Things like this definitely do not belong in kernel space. - Holger -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
