[linux-dvb] Re: Bug in ring buffer implementation

[Gregor Lawatscheck]

At 03:51 08/02/2003, you wrote:

Sorry, forget my last message.
In this implementation 'free' is not 'ring buffer free count' but 'ring
buffer free count'+1.

I should not read source code after a long day.

What do you mean? You're certainly onto something here - it certainly improves the situation - not to perfect but it does do something that appears to be going wrong with the ring buffer.


--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.