On Monday 16 June 2003 11:25, Michael Hunold wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > > 1) Is there a reason for the i2c bitrate to be set to 10kHz right now? > > Perhaps some cards have very slow i2c components? It is fine on the > > tda10045h-based cards > > My analog cards have rather slow i2c components, but 10kHz is really the > lower bound. I never bother to change it, because only a couple of bytes > are send on these cards. > > > 2) I've changed the wait-for-status-delay to use mdelay()... which is not > > ideal as we are now effectively busy waiting, but the current 1 jiffy > > delay is WAY too much at the new speed. At 275kHz, it doesn't delay for > > long enough for this to be significant though. > > If Robert's code works reliable, we should go for that and don't wait at > all and use a higher transmission rate.
Unfortunately, it causes other problems in linux... see my latest i2c patch just submitted. -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
