On Friday 11 July 2003 14:32, Robert Schlabbach wrote: > From: "Michael Hunold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > 1) Why was tda10045h.c renamed to tda1004x.c? > > Yes. > > > Does it support other frontends besides the tda10045h now? > > AFAIK, no. Andrew renamed it in preparation of future TDA10046H support, > but the TDA10046H has a good number of differences compared to the > TDA10045H, so there'll have to be a number of different code paths. Anyway, > since Andrew is the maintainer of the code, I'll leave that to him...
The main difference is in the init code and the bandwidth setting code. I reorganised the driver so there was a tda10045h_init() and a tda10045h_set_bandwidth() function. Later I will add a tda10046_init() and a tda10046_set_bandwidth() function. Or would it be better from a getting-it-into-linux point of view to split it up? I need a definite yes or no please... otherwise I will leave it as it is. -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
