Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 11.58 schrieb Michael Hunold: > Hello Rene, > > > As I definitely have artefacts with 64 but not with 128 (no wonder as > > SAA7164 demands at least 3750 ns), I want to ask if the code has been > > changed or will be changed.
> If noone objects within the next few days, IMHO this can be deleted. If > anyone needs a different latency setting, it can be done via setpci just > like you did. > > It would be cool if you could prepare a patch then which can be applied > to the DVB tree. > I'm a ugly C-programmer, but I can try (no warranties it'll work flawlessly). Currently I'm thinking about either setting it to 128 or deleting it. PCI-latency of 64 would only have meaning for a 66 MHz PCI-bus. So who put it in and why? Can the SAA7146 be soldered on a 66 MHz-board? Does Linux calculate the latency correctly from min. latency demanded from the chipset? -- Rene Bartsch Faculties MNI Computer Science 8th Semester FH Giessen/Friedberg, Germany Facsimile/Phone: +49 7 00/72 27 87 24 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
