On Friday 27 February 2004 10:24, Nico wrote: > Andrew de Quincey wrote: > >On Friday 27 February 2004 09:47, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > >>On Friday 27 February 2004 08:45, Nico wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>>I just downloaded dvb-kernel from cvs and I was greeted with this log, > >>>not present in the release drivers: > >>> > >>>stv0299 does not support auto-inversion > >>> > >>>so INVERSION_OFF is a safe bet? Or is there some transponder that uses > >>>INVERSION_ON? > >>> > >>>I need to fix mplayer's code, that always uses _AUTO :( > >>> > >>> Nico > >>>// > >> > >>That _should_ have been sorted with the latest dvb_frontend.c. I'll > >> check. > > > >Ah, I see whats happening; dvb_frontend.c is being left at the older > > version 'cos of the upcoming release. I'll reinstate the old behaviour > > yet again. > > > >All the same VDR should really not be suppling INVERSION_AUTO to a > > frontend where I've very carefully removed the FE_CAN_INVERSION_AUTO flag > > from its capabilities. > > so I should check if it has FE_CAN_INVERSION_AUTO ? > I didn't know this flag even existed, sorry.
Actually, I don't know if its worth doing anything; the new dvb_frontend.c will automatically do auto inversion if the frontend supports it. But it won't be as fast as if the correct inversion setting was supplied. > This morning stv0299 never tuned, not even with INVERSION_OFF (srate was > 27500, frequency always taken by the other drivers); > I'll retry tonight your updated code. I think perhaps the stv0299.c should be left at the version prior to my modifications for the upcoming release; I'm still heavily developing it. -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
