I have some doubts about the current V4 CI API draft. I still think that the ioctl/message style is easier to understand than the read/write approach. But I think that it is better to handle multiple slots in one CI device and pass the slot number explicitly, just like in the V3 API. IIRC it was also discussed on the list that we need to support different CI message protocols, like link layer and transport layer (or maybe even more). True?
Please let me know what you think. Johannes -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
