Peter Henderson wrote: > Looks like I've fixed the int underflow problem, but created an overflow > for hi frequencies. > > Can we patch mt352.c again. > - tmp = ((param->frequency*6)/1000000) + IF_FREQUENCYx6; > + tmp = ((param->frequency*3)/500000) + IF_FREQUENCYx6; > > > as 834000000*6 > 2^32
Comitted to CVS. Johannes
