Hi,

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:23:02PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> Artem Makhutov wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:52:39PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> >>Artem Makhutov wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:18:52AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> >>>>Also, can you please do a benchmark in lock timings between changeset 
> >>>>7205 and 7200 ?
> >>>Do you mean changeset 7200 or 7204
> >>yep. 7205 is head, but just a minor change.
> >
> >I did the benchmark betweet 7205 and 7204.
> >The modules were loaded with no additional parameters.
> >
> >Tuning time in 7204: ~0.83 seconds (min 0.81191 sec ; max 2.428967 sec)
> >Tuning time in 7205: ~0.26 seconds (min 0.24789 sec ; max 1.994216 sec)
> 
> 
> Can you test the time between 7200 and 7204/7205.
> (7201 - 7204 contains an optimization, compared to 7200 and hence
> the need to check the results. So need to exclude 7201 and 7204)

Ok, I got it. I was in the believe that the tuning will only work ~50 percent
successfull with rev 7200...)

Here are the results of the benchmarks with rev 7200:

A tune needs ~1 second.
Min: 0.829529 ; Max: 3.074599

The log file is available at:
http://www.makhutov.org/downloads/dvb/logs/7200.log.gz

So your optimizations works great ;)

Regards, Artem

-- 
Artem Makhutov
Unterort Str. 36
D-65760 Eschborn

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Reply via email to