On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 11:07 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > We do have such machines, which is why this change has been reverted twice > already. I believe we should stick to the priority scheme I proposed a few > weeks ago.
I seem to have missed that discussion, and couldn't find it after a
brief search. Got a pointer?
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{�y����^n�r���z���h�����&�� �G���h�(�階�ݢj"���m������z�ޖ���f���h���~�m�
