On 18 June 2014 10:50, Matt Fleming <m...@console-pimps.org> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun, at 01:11:51PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> The shared efistub code for ARM and arm64 contains a local copy of >> linux_banner, >> allowing it to be referenced from separate executables such as the ARM >> decompressor. However, this introduces a dependency on generated header >> files, >> causing unnecessary rebuilds of the stub itself and, in case of arm64, >> vmlinux >> which contains it. >> >> On arm64, the copy is not actually needed since we can reference the original >> symbol directly, and as it turns out, there may be better ways to deal with >> this >> for ARM as well, so let's remove it from the shared code. If it still needs >> to >> be reintroduced for ARM later, it should live under arch/arm anyway and not >> in >> shared code. > > I remember making some similar arguments when this patch was first > introduced. From looking at my notes, the patch rationale was based on > some DT binding discussion where people wanted an explicit way to > identify the kernel they were booting and everyone agreed upon this > string - I don't know which discussion, I don't have that data. > > I'm more than happy to delete this from the shared code, I never wanted > it to go in in the first place. But could someone please give me some > details as to why this change is safe and isn't going to break > ARM/ARM64? How does this affect DT bindings? >
This just removes the duplicate definition of linux_banner, *not* the reference to it a couple of lines down. IOW, the DT bindings and everything behind it are not affected at all by this patch. The reason it works fine for arm64 is that its stub is part of the kernel proper, so the reference will bind to the global definition instead. What will be affected is 32-bit ARM, as its stub is not part of the kernel proper. In this case, we will propose an alternative [and better] way of allowing the stub to reference linux_banner, i.e., without having to redefine it at the C level. We will take this into account when we propose the next round of efistub patches for ARM. Regards, Ard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
