On 4 July 2014 17:45, Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09:06AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> According to the UEFI spec section 2.3.6.4, the use of FP/SIMD instructions >> is >> allowed, and should adhere to the AAPCS64 calling convention, which states >> that >> 'only the bottom 64 bits of each value stored in registers v8-v15 need to be >> preserved' (section 5.1.2). >> >> This applies equally to UEFI Runtime Services called by the kernel, so make >> sure >> the FP/SIMD register file is preserved in this case. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> > > While the code looks fine, I think there is a mismatch between what the > subject says and what the patch does (enabling EFI_RUNTIME_WRAPPERS). >
Not entirely. In order to be able to insert calls to kernel_neon_begin()/end() into the runtime services calls, we need a) to supply definitions for efi_call_virt() and __efi_call_virt() that contain those calls to kernel_neon_begin()/end() b) to enable runtime wrappers (which is what uses those definitions) Would you prefer those to be split in 2 patches? -- Ard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
