From: Matt Fleming <[email protected]>

The comment describing how struct efivars->lock is used hasn't been
updated in sync with the code. Fix it.

Reported-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Waychison <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/efi.h | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index 59c8acfebca7..efc681fd5895 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -1040,12 +1040,8 @@ struct efivar_operations {
 struct efivars {
        /*
         * ->lock protects two things:
-        * 1) ->list - adds, removals, reads, writes
-        * 2) ops.[gs]et_variable() calls.
-        * It must not be held when creating sysfs entries or calling kmalloc.
-        * ops.get_next_variable() is only called from register_efivars()
-        * or efivar_update_sysfs_entries(),
-        * which is protected by the BKL, so that path is safe.
+        * 1) efivarfs_list and efivars_sysfs_list
+        * 2) ->ops calls
         */
        spinlock_t lock;
        struct kset *kset;
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to