On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Christopher Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see. Thanks for the review. So the above case should not raise
> error. However, the following one should:
>
> static __pure void *(*f3_err) = non_pure_func;
>
> I got it the other way around. I will add that to the test case
> and send out the second round review.

I send push out the v2 version of the test case at
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/devel/sparse/chrisl/sparse.git/log/?h=review-pure-attr2

I haven't include the fix part yet. Do you see any thing wrong with the test
case?

Thanks

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to