On 21.06.17 15:00:25, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 20.06.17 09:49:32, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:34:39AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > On 07.06.17 12:50:12, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Thanks, I've pushed this out as:
> > > >
> > > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git 
> > > > for-next/ras-apei
> > > >
> > > > which I'll merge into for-next/core (and therefore linux-next) either 
> > > > the
> > > > end of this week or the beginning of next week. Please take a look if 
> > > > you
> > > > get a chance.
> > > 
> > > any reason why there was a roll back of for-next/core?
> > > 
> > >  + 0870f692c2ed...e27c7fa015d6 for-next/core -> arm64/for-next/core  
> > > (forced update)
> > > 
> > > Is it because for-next/ras-apei goes through tip?
> > 
> > No, it's because the RAS stuff ran into horrible conflicts with the UUID
> > tree:
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/16/22
> > 
> > Tyler should be rebasing that soon, so hopefully I can requeue that stuff
> > this week.
> 
> Note there are also conflicts with tip-ras from Borsis' tree.

Turned out this is actually the ras/core branch from tip tree, esp.

 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=7bf130e4a065

-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to