> While the allocator does print an error when allocations fail,
> it may not be immediately apparent to the user what the
> *consequences* are. In this case, the consequence is that the
> device properties will not be available for consumption by
> drivers and they may fail to probe or behave in entirely
> unexpected ways.
Would it make sense to indicate such a questionable software situation
be any return code?
> Hence I deliberately printed an error message here so that the user
> can make the connection between erratic behavior of drivers later on
> and the memory allocation error here.
Do you find this terse message really sufficient?
Can the mentioned properties be required for the desired system configuration?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html