On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 12:12:38AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 13 July 2018 at 23:33, Lukas Wunner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 04:57:36AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> >> vim +425 drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
> >>
> >>    415
> >>    416        static efi_status_t efi_open_volume(efi_system_table_t 
> >> *sys_table_arg,
> >>    417                                            efi_loaded_image_t 
> >> *image,
> >>    418                                            efi_file_handle_t **__fh)
> >>    419        {
> >>    420                efi_file_io_interface_t *io;
> >>    421                efi_file_handle_t *fh;
> >>    422                efi_guid_t fs_proto = EFI_FILE_SYSTEM_GUID;
> >>    423                efi_status_t status;
> >>    424                void *handle =
> >>  > 425                        (void *)efi_table_attr(efi_loaded_image, 
> >> device_handle, image);
> >                                         ^
> > My apologies Ard, it seems I forgot an (unsigned long) cast here.
> >
> > Will give this a thorough review tomorrow morning with a fresh pair
> > of eyeballs.
> 
> No worries, I can fix it up.

During a round of reviewing and testing this morning I found a checkpatch
issue, there are eight spaces which should be replaced by a tab in line 429
of drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c:

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c 
b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
index 292576838708..e94975f4655b 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static efi_status_t efi_open_volume(efi_system_table_t 
*sys_table_arg,
                                                             image);
 
        status = efi_call_early(handle_protocol, handle,
-                               &fs_proto, (void **)&io);
+                               &fs_proto, (void **)&io);
        if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
                efi_printk(sys_table_arg, "Failed to handle fs_proto\n");
                return status;


Also, I noticed that for some reason, efi/urgent commit d7f2e972e702
("efi/x86: remove pointless call to PciIo->Attributes()") is currently
squashed into the top-most commit on the efi/next branch.  Not sure if
intentional, but probably not?

Thanks & have a pleasant weekend.

Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to