* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 21:07, Kammela, Gayatri
> <gayatri.kamm...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ard,
> >
> >
> > I have come across an issue where i could not boot kernel  on x86_64 qemu  
> > when applied this commit 4543fea0423b221d6 ("acpi: bgrt: parse BGRT to 
> > obtain BMP address before it gets clobbered") . The issue is reproducible 
> > with x86_64_defconfig if the configuration option "CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT" is 
> > enabled. I am looking in to it and it may take some time for me but the 
> > issue is triggered with the function ("efi_mem_reserve(bgrt->image_address, 
> > bgrt_image_size);") added in the commit 7b0a911478c74ca (" efi/x86: Move 
> > the EFI BGRT init code to early init code").  I just observed that this 
> > patch made it to the tip tree.
> >
> >
> 
> Thanks, Gayatri, for the report.
> 
> I can confirm this locally, with QEMU. Apologies for not spotting this
> before - my kernelci boot tests on x86 failed to trigger it.
> 
> Ingo, could you please either revert this patch, or just drop it from
> the top of the efi/core branch? I will follow up in more detail later,
> but it may take me until early next week.

Sure, I've dropped it.

The patch did look a bit dangerous to me too, but it also fixed a real 
bug. If you don't find the root cause of the regression then could we try 
introducing the concept in smaller increments, spread out over 2-5 
patches, to the extent this is possible?

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to