On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 05:38:54AM +0000, Chester Lin wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index f3ce34113f89..909b11ba48d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1184,6 +1184,9 @@ void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
>               phys_addr_t block_start = reg->base;
>               phys_addr_t block_end = reg->base + reg->size;
>  
> +             if (memblock_is_nomap(reg))
> +                     continue;
> +
>               if (reg->base < vmalloc_limit) {
>                       if (block_end > lowmem_limit)
>                               /*

I think this hunk is sane - if the memory is marked nomap, then it isn't
available for the kernel's use, so as far as calculating where the
lowmem/highmem boundary is, it effectively doesn't exist and should be
skipped.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

Reply via email to