Adrian Bunk wrote: > But if you want to discover size change with minimal configs early you > anyway have to both: > - constantly keep your configs in shape so that they are both minimal > for some set of hardware support and features and > - investigate for any size changes what caused them > (experience has shown that putting information on a webpage doesn't > fix problems - even for compile errors). Amen to that last point!
> > You need both, and ideally constantly done by the same person against > Linus' tree, -next and -mm. > > Where to get your minimal configs from at the start is just a small > thing at the beginning - don't underestimate the required manual work > that will have to be done each week. This is probably why I haven't signed up for this myself previously. I'd be interested in finding out the rate at which defconfigs bitrot in mainline. My experience is that usually a 'make oldconfig' will produce something usable. But maybe that wouldn't be as effective with a minconfig? Maybe I'll collect some minconfigs, and try maintaining them in my own tree for a few releases to see how onerous it is... The problem is that I can only reasonably do this for boards I have, so there'd only be a few. But maybe that'd be enough. They would really only be meant as examples. -- Tim ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America ============================= -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
