On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:35:42AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> > + * The check with sizeof(void*) should make sure that we don't operate on
> > + * pointers, which the compiler wouldn't be able to optimize out, but only
> > + * on string constants.
> 
> Take a look at __builtin_constant_p in the GCC manual.
> 
> You'll probably find that wrapping the whole of the rest of the
> expression (without the sizeof) in __builtin_constant_p is a good
> way to know when to depend on the result of the expression.

Thanks, so if I understood it correctly this should be used like this:

#define PRINTK_FILTER(fmt) (                                                    
\
        (((const char *)(fmt))[0] != '<' && CONFIG_PRINTK_VERBOSITY >= 4) ||    
\
        (((const char *)(fmt))[0] == '<' &&                                     
\
         ((const char *)(fmt))[1] <= *__stringify(CONFIG_PRINTK_VERBOSITY))     
\
)

#define printk(fmt, ...) ({                                                     
\
        if (__builtin_constant_p(PRINTK_FILTER(fmt)) && PRINTK_FILTER(fmt))     
\
                printk((fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__);                                   
\
})

The sizeof check wouldn't be necessary. Is this correct?

Marc

-- 
 Marc Andre Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to