2010/11/24 Paul Mundt <let...@linux-sh.org>:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * Debug code
>> + */
>> +#define pram_dbg(s, args...) pr_debug("PRAMFS: "s, ## args)
>> +#define pram_err(s, args...) pr_err("PRAMFS: "s, ## args)
>> +#define pram_warn(s, args...) pr_warning("PRAMFS: "s, ## args)
>> +#define pram_info(s, args...) pr_info("PRAMFS: "s, ## args)
>> +
> Please kill off all of this and just use KBUILD_MODNAME centrally.
I didn't know this way to do, I'll look at it.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRAMFS_WRITE_PROTECT
>> +extern void pram_writeable(void *vaddr, unsigned long size, int rw);
>> +
>> +#define wrprotect(addr, size) pram_writeable(addr, size, 0)
>> +
>> +#else
>> +
>> +#define wrprotect(addr, size) do {} while (0)
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG PRAMFS_WRITE_PROTECT */
>> +
> Perhaps this should be pram_wrprotect()? Does this really benefit from
> being a config option instead of a mount option? Will this handle
> multiple mounts with some write protected and others not?
See my previous response.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRAMFS_WRITE_PROTECT
>> +static inline void pram_memunlock_range(void *p, unsigned long len)
>> +{
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_X86
>> + local_irq_disable();
>> +#endif
>> + preempt_disable();
>> + pram_writeable(p, len, 1);
>> +}
>> +
> This needs some explaining, or killing. While the latter is preferable,
> we can also work with the former.
>
Maybe I didn't understand, you mean preemt_disable() without disabling
the interrupt?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
