On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> but maybe it would be about APM being enabled. Which is what the caller
>> actually seems to care about and talks about for the failure case. Maybe
>> you need separate functions for the "is APM enabled" case for the naming
>> to make sense. Hmm?
> That sounds like a good idea.  What about the following patch?

This patch I have no problems with.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to