On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 05:59:29PM +0800, Yue Hu wrote: > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:51:58 +0800 > Gao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Gao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > >
... > > > > > > > > Which lz4 version is used? it would be better to use lz4 1.9.3 > > > > (or 1.9.2 with some unexpected CR issues.) > > > > > > Hi Xiang, > > > > > > ok, let me check. > > > > At least, lz4 1.8.3 ~ 1.9.1 are buggy, for more details, see: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git/tree/README?h=dev#n107 > > > > wow, working fine when i upgrade lz4 version from 1.8.3 to 1.9.3 bypass vndk > error. > Thanks for the feedback, I'm now working on add unique testcases to intercept such broken lz4 versions as well, the WIP branch is https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs-utils.git/log/?h=experimental-test > And seems canned fs config processing has minor issue. I will double check > and submit patch if possible. Comments, patches, evaluation are always welcome :) (btw, I'm about to release erofs-utils v1.2 this month...) Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Thank you! > > > >
