On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:24 PM Gao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, I know what's your main point here. Ok, that's fine we > could change the current behavior. Yet I still think the current > behavior may benefit some use cases (e.g. metadata size is sensible, > we need to avoid extended inodes no matter per-filetimestamp is).. > > So instead, how about introducing --ignore-mtime instead for the > current behavior, and change the default behavior into using extended > inodes? > > Sounds good to me, I'll make this change.
