Hi Yue,

On 2023/6/27 16:53, Yue Hu wrote:
From: Yue Hu <[email protected]>

Currently hard links can't be extracted correctly, let's support it now.

Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <[email protected]>

Thanks for the patch!  Some minor comments below...

---
  fsck/main.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
  1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
index f816bec..e78f67c 100644
--- a/fsck/main.c
+++ b/fsck/main.c
@@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ static struct option long_options[] = {
        {0, 0, 0, 0},
  };
+#define NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE 16384
+
+struct hardlink_entry {

erofsfsck_hardlink_entry {

or erofsfsck_linkentry if the above is too long

+       struct list_head list;
+       erofs_nid_t nid;
+       char *path;
+};
+
+static struct list_head hardlink_hashtable[NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE];

erofsfsck_link_hashtable

+
  static void print_available_decompressors(FILE *f, const char *delim)
  {
        unsigned int i = 0;
@@ -550,6 +560,64 @@ static inline int erofs_extract_dir(struct erofs_inode 
*inode)
        return 0;
  }
+static char *erofsfsck_hardlink_find(erofs_nid_t nid)
+{
+       struct list_head *head =
+                       &hardlink_hashtable[nid % NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE];
+       struct hardlink_entry *entry;
+
+       if (list_empty(head))
+               return NULL;

why we need that?

+
+       list_for_each_entry(entry, head, list)
+               if (entry->nid == nid)
+                       return entry->path;
+       return NULL;
+}
+
+static int erofsfsck_hardlink_insert(erofs_nid_t nid, const char *path)
+{
+       struct hardlink_entry *entry;
+
+       entry = malloc(sizeof(*entry));
+       if (!entry)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       entry->nid = nid;
+       entry->path = strdup(path);
+       if (!entry->path)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       list_add_tail(&entry->list,
+                     &hardlink_hashtable[nid % NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE]);
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static void erofsfsck_hardlink_init(void)
+{
+       unsigned int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE; ++i)
+               init_list_head(&hardlink_hashtable[i]);
+}
+
+static void erofsfsck_hardlink_exit(void)
+{
+       struct hardlink_entry *entry, *n;
+       struct list_head *head;
+       unsigned int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE; ++i) {
+               head = &hardlink_hashtable[i];
+
+               list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, n, head, list) {
+                       if (entry->path)
+                               free(entry->path);
+                       free(entry);
+               }
+       }
+}
+
  static inline int erofs_extract_file(struct erofs_inode *inode)
  {
        bool tryagain = true;
@@ -719,6 +787,57 @@ static int erofsfsck_dirent_iter(struct erofs_dir_context 
*ctx)
        return ret;
  }
+static int erofsfsck_extract_inode(struct erofs_inode *inode)
+{
+       int ret;
+       char *oldpath;
+
+       if (!fsckcfg.extract_path || erofs_is_packed_inode(inode)) {

why introducing erofs_is_packed_inode here?

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Reply via email to