On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 03:53:25PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 03:22:28PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Uh, no. I vasty underestimated how sensitive that change would be. Plus > > arguably ->kill_sb() really should be callable once the sb is visible. > > > > Are you looking into this or do you want me to, Christoph? > > I'm planning to look into it, but I won't get to it before tomorrow.
Ok, let me go through the callsites and make sure that all callers are safe. I think we should just continue calling deactivate_locked_super() exactly the way we do right now but remove shenanigans like the one we have in erofs_kill_sb().
