On 2023/8/14 11:42, Jingbo Xu wrote:
Add erofs_inode_tag_opaque() helper checking if it's an opaque directory.

Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <[email protected]>
---
  include/erofs/internal.h |  2 ++
  include/erofs/xattr.h    | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++
  lib/tar.c                |  5 -----
  lib/xattr.c              | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/erofs/internal.h b/include/erofs/internal.h
index 892dc96..3631cc1 100644
--- a/include/erofs/internal.h
+++ b/include/erofs/internal.h
@@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ struct erofs_inode {
  #endif
        erofs_off_t fragmentoff;
        unsigned int fragment_size;
+
+       bool opaque;

could we move it upwards? for example, just under
        bool with_tmpfile;

  };
static inline erofs_off_t erofs_iloc(struct erofs_inode *inode)
diff --git a/include/erofs/xattr.h b/include/erofs/xattr.h
index 634daf9..21d669b 100644
--- a/include/erofs/xattr.h
+++ b/include/erofs/xattr.h
@@ -73,6 +73,27 @@ static inline unsigned int xattrblock_offset(struct 
erofs_inode *vi,
  #ifndef XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT
  #define XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT "system.posix_acl_default"
  #endif
+#ifndef OVL_XATTR_NAMESPACE
+#define OVL_XATTR_NAMESPACE "overlay."
+#endif
+#ifndef OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_POSTFIX
+#define OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_POSTFIX "opaque"
+#endif
+#ifndef OVL_XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX
+#define OVL_XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX OVL_XATTR_NAMESPACE
+#endif
+#ifndef OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_SUFFIX
+#define OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_SUFFIX OVL_XATTR_NAMESPACE OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_POSTFIX
+#endif
+#ifndef OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_SUFFIX_LEN
+#define OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_SUFFIX_LEN (sizeof(OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_SUFFIX) - 1)
+#endif
+#ifndef OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE
+#define OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE OVL_XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_POSTFIX
+#endif
+#ifndef OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_LEN
+#define OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_LEN (sizeof(OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE) - 1)
+#endif

I'd like to avoid export these symbols in the headers, how about moving all
related logic into lib/xattr.c?

int erofs_scan_file_xattrs(struct erofs_inode *inode);
  int erofs_prepare_xattr_ibody(struct erofs_inode *inode);
@@ -86,6 +107,7 @@ int erofs_xattr_write_name_prefixes(struct erofs_sb_info 
*sbi, FILE *f);
  int erofs_setxattr(struct erofs_inode *inode, char *key,
                   const void *value, size_t size);
  int erofs_read_xattrs_from_disk(struct erofs_inode *inode);
+void erofs_inode_tag_opaque(struct erofs_inode *inode);
#ifdef __cplusplus
  }
diff --git a/lib/tar.c b/lib/tar.c
index 42590d2..d7a58d2 100644
--- a/lib/tar.c
+++ b/lib/tar.c
@@ -19,11 +19,6 @@
  #include "erofs/xattr.h"
  #include "erofs/blobchunk.h"
-#define OVL_XATTR_NAMESPACE "overlay."
-#define OVL_XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX OVL_XATTR_NAMESPACE
-#define OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_POSTFIX "opaque"
-#define OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE OVL_XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_POSTFIX
-
  #define EROFS_WHITEOUT_DEV    0
static char erofs_libbuf[16384];
diff --git a/lib/xattr.c b/lib/xattr.c
index 8d8f9f0..e9aff53 100644
--- a/lib/xattr.c
+++ b/lib/xattr.c
@@ -1421,6 +1421,50 @@ int erofs_listxattr(struct erofs_inode *vi, char 
*buffer, size_t buffer_size)
        return shared_listxattr(vi, &it);
  }
+static bool erofs_xattr_is_opaque(struct xattr_item *item)
+{
+       struct ea_type_node *tnode;
+       unsigned int plen;
+       const char *prefix;
+
+       if (item->prefix == EROFS_XATTR_INDEX_TRUSTED &&
+           !strncmp(item->kvbuf, OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_SUFFIX,
+                    OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_SUFFIX_LEN))
+               return true;
+
+       if (item->prefix & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX) {
+               list_for_each_entry(tnode, &ea_name_prefixes, list) {
+                       prefix = tnode->type.prefix;
+                       plen = tnode->type.prefix_len;
+                       if (tnode->index == item->prefix &&
+                           plen + item->len[0] == OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE_LEN &&
+                           !strncmp(prefix, OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE, plen) &&
+                           !strncmp(item->kvbuf, OVL_XATTR_OPAQUE + plen,
+                                    item->len[0]))
+                               return true;

These looks too complicated to me, how about just connect prefix and
suffix strings and do a string comparsion together?

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Reply via email to